Product Teams
A product manager who knows the answer to 'why did we build it this way' exists in some doc, somewhere, written by someone who left.
[ 01 ]The problem
Product decisions decay into mysteries. The PRD said one thing, the shipped feature does another, and the reasoning lives in a meeting that wasn't recorded. Teams re-debate settled questions because the settlement was never durable — and roadmaps wobble under re-litigated history.
[ 02 ]How Mynd handles it
Decisions become records, not memories
Y0 connects PRDs, research, tickets, and launch notes into one graph — and extracts the decisions, with their rationale, as first-class objects.
'Why' becomes a query
Anyone can ask why the onboarding flow skips email verification and get the decision, the data behind it, and who made it — in seconds, with sources.
New work checks itself against history
When a new spec contradicts a settled decision, the runtime flags it during drafting — re-open deliberately, or align, but never accidentally.
[ 03 ][ example run ]
plan ✦ draft spec: onboarding revamp context ✓ product graph — PRDs, research, launches context ✓ settled decisions — 3 touch this flow execute → spec drafted execute → conflict flagged: contradicts decision d-114 result ✓ spec aligned · decision re-opened on purpose, not by accident
[ 04 ]fewer re-litigated decisions per quarter